Do You Trust Answers?: Credibility Judgments in Social Search Using Social Q&A Sites
نویسندگان
چکیده
People are increasingly using social question and answer (Q&A) sites as a source of information. Asking a question on a social Q&A site is a form of social search, as it enables the site’s users to find information by utilizing social resources through interactions with other people. In social Q&A settings, people interact with online content created by other users, and also with unknown people. As a result, individuals encounter challenges in making credibility judgments. Therefore, it is important to understand how people make credibility judgments when asking and answering questions within social Q&A settings. In this paper, we first present an overview of related work regarding social Q&A, social search, and credibility assessment in social Q&A settings. This review indicates the necessity of investigating how people trust answers when using social Q&A sites. We propose a conceptual framework for examining this problem within the context of social search. Author
منابع مشابه
Iron Mask: Trust-Preserving Anonymity on the Face of Stigmatization in Social Networking Sites
Social networking sites are pervasively being used for seeking advice, asking questions, giving answers, and sharing experiences on various topics including health. When users share content about sensitive health topics, such as sexual dysfunction, infertility, or STDs, they may wish to do so anonymously to avoid stigmatization and the associated negative effects on mental health. However, a us...
متن کاملWhy do you ask this?∗ Using Toolbar Data to Identify Common Patterns of Q&A Users
We use Yahoo! Toolbar data to gain insights into why people use Q&A sites. For this purpose we look at tens of thousands of questions asked on both Yahoo! Answers and on Wiki Answers. We analyze both the pre-question behavior of users as well as their general online behavior. Using an existing approach (Harper et al.), we classify questions into “informational” vs. “conversational”. Finally, fo...
متن کاملTrust in E-Commerce: Social Networks vs. Institutional Credibility
E-Commerce’s virtuality poses questions concerning trust between buyer and seller. Web 2.0 formats have provided new complications for these questions. Companies are creating more social networking sites, experimenting with ways to use such networks for marketing purposes. This paper explores the issue of trust in social networking site transactions vs. those at more established e-commerce site...
متن کاملThe Dimensions of Web Site Credibility and Their Relation to Active Trust and Behavioural Impact
This paper discusses two trends that threaten to undermine the effectiveness of online social marketing interventions: growing mistrust and competition. As a solution, this paper examines the relationships between Web site credibility, target audiences’ active trust and behaviour. Using structural equation modelling to evaluate two credibility models, this study concludes that Web site credibil...
متن کاملCredibility of Social Network Sites for Political Information Among Politically Interested Internet Users
Scholars have confirmed that political candidates are increasingly turning to social network sites (SNS) to persuade voters to vote for them, and that these sites have become prominent sources of political information. But a fundamental question arises about the sustainability of social networks as a campaign tool: Howmuch do users trust the information they find there?This study employed an on...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012